Multi-threaded programs have traditionally fallen into one of two domains: cooperative and competitive. These two domains have traditionally remained mostly disjoint, with cooperative threading used for increasing throughput in compute-intensive applications such as scientific workloads and cooperative threading used for increasing responsiveness in interactive applications such as GUIs and games. As multicore hardware becomes increasingly mainstream, there is a need for bridging these two disjoint worlds, because many applications mix interaction and computation and would benefit from both cooperative and competitive threading.
In this paper, we present techniques for programming and reasoning about parallel interactive applications that can use both cooperative and competitive threading. Our techniques enable the programmer to write rich parallel interactive programs by creating and synchronizing with threads as needed, and by assigning threads user-defined and partially ordered priorities. To ensure important responsiveness properties, we present a modal type system analogous to S4 modal logic that precludes low-priority threads from delaying high-priority threads, thereby statically preventing a crucial set of priority-inversion bugs. We then present a cost model that allows reasoning about responsiveness and completion time of well-typed programs. The cost model extends the traditional work-span model for cooperative threading to account for competitive scheduling decisions needed to ensure responsiveness. Finally, we show that our proposed techniques are realistic by implementing them as an extension to the Standard ML language.
Tue 25 Sep Times are displayed in time zone: (GMT-05:00) Guadalajara, Mexico City, Monterrey change
|10:30 - 10:52|
|10:52 - 11:15|
Martin ElsmanUniversity of Copenhagen, Denmark, Troels HenriksenUniversity of Copenhagen, Denmark, Danil AnnenkovDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Cosmin OanceaUniversity of Copenhagen, DenmarkLink to publication DOI
|11:15 - 11:37|
Atsushi OhoriTohoku University, Japan, Katsuhiro UenoTohoku University, Hisayuki MimaTohoku UniversityDOI
|11:37 - 12:00|
Ivan PerezNational Institute of Aerospace, USADOI